Newsletters

THE SENATE

Senate Dems unveil new push on conditions for Israel

More than a dozen Senate Democrats are pushing to condition U.S. military aid for Israel over its adherence to international laws for armed conflicts and delivery of humanitarian aid to Palestinian civilians in the war-torn Gaza Strip.

Progressive senators led by Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) introduced an amendment to the Israel-Ukraine-Taiwan supplemental funding bill that imposes these conditions. The proposal requires a report to Congress on each country’s use of U.S.-supplied weapons.

The effort is a reflection of some Democrats’ criticisms of Israel’s military operations in Gaza, which began in response to the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas terrorists. Several top Democrats have suggested Israel isn’t doing enough to limit civilian casualties, pointing to the thousands of Palestinian deaths. They’ve argued that Israel’s efforts to destroy Hamas have therefore been made less effective.

The amendment applies to all countries receiving U.S. aid as part of President Joe Biden’s new foreign-aid funding request, so it doesn’t mention Israel by name.

But the senators who sponsored it are among those progressives who’ve urged Biden to do more to ensure that Israel’s military is minimizing civilian casualties and allowing humanitarian assistance to enter Gaza. Five of the Senate sponsors named Israel in their statements supporting the amendment.

“American support cannot be a blank check to a right-wing Netanyahu government that has demonstrated a gross disregard for the lives of Palestinian civilians,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said.

Those Democrats who support placing conditions on the aid have noted that Congress routinely does this with other nations, including on human rights grounds. They argue that Israel shouldn’t be an exception.

But a majority of Democrats –including Biden – and pretty much all Republicans oppose the idea of conditioning aid for Israel, so it’s safe to say this amendment isn’t going anywhere.

Still, it’s been a point of contention within the Senate Democratic Caucus lately and among progressives nationwide, many of whom have called for a permanent ceasefire.

Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), a former synagogue president and a vocal Israel supporter, spoke on the Senate floor this week lambasting the idea of placing conditions on military assistance for Israel.

Rosen called out “members of my own party” for advocating an approach that she says would “undermine Israel’s ability to defend itself, and would send a signal to the world that America’s support for our ally is weakening, which is exactly what Iran and its terrorist proxies… want.”

Other Democrats have said the Biden administration’s current strategy — publicly and privately urging Israel to exercise more caution in its military operations — is a more effective one and has yielded results.

— Andrew Desiderio

2024 WATCH

House Dems, GOP trade border for economic issues to reach Hispanics

While negotiations over immigration, border security and the migrant crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border continue to dominate Capitol Hill, you won’t see either party making those the top issues when trying to reach Hispanic voters.

House Republicans and Democrats alike told us they are instead focusing on kitchen table topics like the economy, health care and education to win Hispanic votes in 2024.

Some lawmakers say tagging immigration as the top issue for Hispanic voters is not only out-of-touch but outdated. Both parties are trying to change the narrative.

“When people ask me what the Hispanic issues are out there, I tell them it’s the same issues as you and I. It’s education, safe streets and jobs,” Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-Ariz.) told us. “We just need to be aggressive and talk about the things we have in common.”

It’s no secret that Republicans have made the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border a central issue during this Congress, even blocking legislation this week that didn’t include more resources for border security. The border also remains a significant political liability for the Biden administration with record-high levels of illegal crossings every day.

But the parties’ strategies are in line with what polling shows: Immigration and border issues are relatively low on the list of priorities for Hispanic voters.

A November Unidos US poll of 3,037 Latino voters found the cost of living, the economy and health care were the top three issues. Immigration and border was the sixth highest-rated issue that voters cared about.

Here’s a look at what both parties are doing to reach Hispanic voters, as well as the races to watch next year.

Republican strategy: Congressional Hispanic Conference co-chairs Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) and Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.) told us they’ve distributed more than $400,000 to members of their group this year.

Gonzales said they have traveled to several cities in Texas and Ciscomani’s Arizona district to raise money for incumbents through their campaign arm, the Hispanic Leadership Trust. HLT will hold another event in Dallas in February.

The House GOP Campaign arm has also recruited 11 candidates to take on Democratic incumbents. Thirty of the NRCC’s battleground districts have a higher-than-average Hispanic vote share.

Kevin Lincoln is challenging Rep. Josh Harder in California’s 9th District; George Logan will again face Rep. Jahana Hayes in Connecticut’s 5th district; former Rep. Mayra Flores is challenging Rep. Vicente Gonzalez in Texas’ 34th District; Gabe Evans is going up against Rep. Yadira Caraveo in Colorado’s 8th District; and Maria Montero is taking on Rep. Susan Wild in Pennsylvania’s 7th District.

Democrats’ view: Rep. Nanette Barragan (D-Calif.) launched the “CHC on the Road” initiative this year, connecting members and administration officials with Latino voters to tout Democrats’ legislative successes.

This year, Barragan has traveled to Florida, Texas, New Mexico and Arizona with other members of the CHC. They’ve been joined by Vice President Kamala Harris, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, among others.

Barragan told us she is also planning trips to Colorado, Georgia and California.

“People think, ‘Oh well, California is unnecessary.’ But we need to make sure we’re reaching out to these growing Latino populated areas,” Barragan said.

Victoria McGroary, the CHC BOLD PAC’s executive director, said abortion rights will also be top of mind for Latino voters in 2024, an issue Democrats across the country plan to run on again.

The BOLD PAC has also raised $6 million to date this cycle, far outpacing its GOP counterpart.

— Mica Soellner and Max Cohen

Lawmakers head to COP28 climate summit with high expectations and conflicting goals

Both Democrats and Republicans are heading to the United Arab Emirates this weekend for the UN’s annual climate conference — but with vastly different missions.

Republicans see COP28 as a chance to promote conservative ideas on the global stage, like maintaining reliance on fossil fuels while advancing cleaner-burning technology.

“I think it’s important that they hear conservative voices in what 21st century energy production is going to look like,” Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-N.D.), who’s leading the House delegation, told us.

Democrats, unsurprisingly, plan to pitch more aggressive climate action largely centered around significantly reducing U.S. dependence on fossil fuels.

We’re following the issue as part of our platform, The Punch Up, which explores efforts to close the equity divide on and off Capitol Hill.

At least seven senators, including Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and 15 House members — including nine Republicans — are expected to attend for part of the two-week summit, which ends Dec. 12.

A GOP climate shift: The comparatively large number of Republicans heading to COP28 is a notable change for a party that historically rejected engaging in climate discussions. Armstrong said the “political science is settled” and consumers are demanding action.

“We want to give consumers what they want,” Armstrong added. “We just don’t want to put U.S. companies at a global disadvantage.”

Democrats, of course, are side-eyeing the GOP mission given the party’s close fossil-fuel ties. “I have yet to see a sincere conservative solution to climate change,” Whitehouse said. “So I have zero confidence in Republican sincerity on climate change.”

Meanwhile, President Joe Biden skipped COP28’s opening, but Vice President Kamala Harris went last weekend following backlash from environmental groups over the president’s decision.

The priorities: House Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) said he’s hoping more countries commit to cutting emissions, especially the more potent methane, as the United States has recently done.

Meanwhile, Republicans are preparing “to present an alternative to the Biden administration’s ambitious clean energy targets.”

Rep. August Pfluger (R-Texas), a member of the Energy and Commerce panel, isn’t attending but said he hopes Republicans push the “narrative” of the GOP energy bill HR 1.

The equity dilemma: The United States is the world’s second-largest emitter of greenhouse gasses after China, but there’s debate about whether it should subsidize the efforts of lower-emitting countries.

Pallone acknowledged it’s difficult to coax the United States and other developed countries to “spend significant resources” to help other nations reach their climate goals. “That’s always a tough one,” he added.

Republicans say countries should be empowered to make their own climate decisions with less U.S. interference.

“We cannot afford to pay for everything for the rest of the world,” said Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.), calling for conservative solutions that include fossil fuels.

“I’m hoping over time, people realize there’s a climate crisis. But we need to do things that actually make sense; that don’t make it more expensive for people to provide electricity for their folks in Sub-Saharan Africa or India or in Central Asia,” Griffith added.

It’s not all head-butting though. “There’s lots of places we agree, and there’s lots of places we disagree,” Armstrong said. “Nuclear — obviously, if you want less carbon — nuclear energy is a huge part of this conversation.”

Lawmakers also agree on the need to reform the arduous permitting processes, Armstrong added.

A toothless convention?: The annual UN summit is often criticized as a pricey pageant with more talk and less action. Democrats have expressed frustration at the difficulty in enforcing the lofty, but voluntary, commitments set by attendants.

“A lot of it is BS and we need to fix that,” Whitehouse said, calling for increased transparency and accountability.

— Elvina Nawaguna

THE CAMPAIGN

Razom, a nonprofit supporting Ukraine, is running an ad, urging Congress to “stand united” with Ukraine “in defense of freedom.” “A win for Putin is a threat to us all,” the ad says. It’s running in D.C.

— Jake Sherman

MOMENTS

All times Eastern

10 a.m.: President Joe Biden will get his daily briefing.

10:55 a.m.: Biden will leave the White House for Joint Base Andrews. From there, Biden will fly to Las Vegas. Karine Jean Pierre and John Kirby will gaggle aboard Air Force One.

4 p.m.: Biden will arrive in Las Vegas.

5:45 p.m.: Biden will deliver remarks about his “Investing in America” agenda at the Carpenter International Training Center.

6:50 p.m.: Biden will depart Las Vegas for Santa Monica, Calif., via Los Angeles, arriving at 8 p.m.

10:30 p.m.: Biden and First Lady Jill Biden will participate in a campaign reception in Santa Monica.

CLIP FILE

AP

NYT

Bloomberg