The Archive

THE TOP

Happy Friday morning and welcome to April. Beware: It is April Fool’s Day. We won’t prank you.

We have a bit of news this morning: Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other top Democrats are eyeing a vote next week on a bill to provide Covid-related relief to the nation’s restaurants. Pelosi’s leadership team discussed the idea during a private meeting Thursday.

The proposal is still coming together. A vote is “under consideration,” a senior Democratic aide told us. However, one idea being discussed is targeting restaurants that previously qualified for federal aid but didn’t receive a grant before the Restaurant Revitalization Fund ran out of money last year.

The big question is will this go anywhere in the Senate?

As we’ve reported in detail, the Senate is close to an agreement on a roughly $10 billion Covid preparedness package, which could be taken up next week as Congress rushes to leave town for the Easter recess. We’ve heard Senate Democrats might offer an amendment to that Covid package that would provide funds for restaurants. But Republicans are insisting any additions be fully offset.

The two sides in the Senate are already having trouble finding a way to pay for the $10 billion in the underlying negotiations, much less any new provisions. The White House has also been cool to the idea of refilling the restaurant fund in recent months.

Still, there is a bipartisan energy around this push. Senate Small Business Committee Chair Ben Cardin (Md.) led a drive to have restaurant relief funding included in the $1.5 trillion omnibus, but that ultimately failed in the face of GOP objections. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Democratic Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (Ariz.) and Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Joni Ernst (Iowa), Bill Cassidy (La.), Roy Blunt (Mo.), Roger Wicker (Miss.) and Cindy Hyde-Smith (Miss.) are just some of the supporters of a bill to replenish the restaurant fund with $48 billion.

Three-dozen House Democrats led by Reps. Dean Phillips (Minn.) and Mike Quigley (Ill.) are on record saying they would “be hesitant” to support a Covid aid package that didn’t include relief for restaurants and other small businesses.

Big picture: We’ve noticed growing tension in the Capitol in recent weeks. The House and Senate aren’t getting along too well.

Yes, that’s a story, in some ways, as old as Congress itself. But on a number of issues, leaders in the two chambers find themselves jockeying over who takes the lead role on these high-profile bills. And with the margins of control so tight, a vote here or there makes the difference between success or failure.

Senate Democrats were shocked a few weeks ago when Pelosi and her leadership team failed to foresee an uprising in their ranks on the Covid funding during debate over the massive omnibus spending bill.

Now, House Democrats are openly criticizing the Senate over their negotiations on the Covid preparedness bill. House Democrats are demanding it include at least some of the $5 billion in global vaccine aid that was initially in the omnibus package last month. “I don’t think it can pass the House without some global funding. So I hope they understand that,” Rep. Tom Malinowski (D-N.J.) told us.

But it’s not just the Covid package. There was some eye-rolling in the Senate on Thursday when the House passed a bill to cap insulin costs at $35 per month. This came despite Schumer’s announcement last week that the Senate was negotiating a bipartisan bill to do the same and more. The Senate is expected to vote on that bill – led by Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) – following the Easter recess.

Also, the House passed a bill to strip favored trade status from Russia and Belarus in response to the invasion of Ukraine. The measure would codify the ban on Russian oil imports already implemented by President Joe Biden. The vote was 424-8, a massive bipartisan win. Now the Senate is totally rewriting the bill after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and others objected.

“The Senate needs to get over itself,” complained Rep. Dan Kildee (D-Mich.), one of the leaders on insulin cost legislation. “The Senate can’t be this elitist body that allows each of its members super-special veto power. It’s got to come to an end.”

Recent examples of jockeying between the two chambers abound. The frustration can be traced back to late last year, when Senate Democrats failed to pass the Build Back Better Act after Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) blocked it. And it took months for the House to pass a bipartisan Senate $1 trillion infrastructure package. Who’s to blame for what happened and how is still hotly debated within the party.

House members in both parties are grumbling about whether the Senate will just sit on bipartisan retirement and marijuana bills too.

Senators have their own complaints about the House.

For instance, several vulnerable Senate Democrats introduced a bill to suspend the federal gas tax in February. Now House Democrats are pursuing ways to address the issue of soaring gas prices. But Pelosi was cool to the idea of a gas tax holiday this week. Pelosi did say gas “rebates” or direct payments are two ideas under consideration by House Democrats, though.

As we noted, this is an age-old dynamic in the Capitol: The Senate thinks the House does what it wants without consideration for the political reality in the upper chamber. The House gets frustrated by what it sees as antiquated Senate rules that limit what can get done – the filibuster. But with an all Democratic Washington, narrow margins in both chambers and a difficult election staring them in the face, the chasm is more pronounced right now.

More from Malinowski on the simmering frustration: