The Archive
Every issue of the Punchbowl News newsletter, including our special editions, right here at your fingertips.
Join the community, and get the morning edition delivered straight to your inbox.
PRESENTED BY
THE TOP
Happy Friday morning. But is it really Friday if the Senate will be in session tomorrow?
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer got another giant step closer to his number one priority – passing a major reconciliation package that top Hill Democrats and President Joe Biden have been working on for the last 18 months. That goal could become a reality by next week.
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) agreed Thursday evening to “move forward” with the reconciliation proposal, aka the Inflation Reduction Act. This came after Schumer and other senior Senate Democrats said they’d strip out the carried-interest provision from the legislation. Remember – carried interest allows hedge fund and private equity managers to pay a lower rate on some of their income. It was a very small part of the revenue generated by this package, coming in at just $14 billion.
Somewhere – well, pretty much everywhere – fund managers are probably getting ready to cut checks to Sinema’s 2024 re-election bid.
Senate Democrats will also revise the corporate minimum tax structure outlined in the plan, hashed out by Schumer and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.). This concession to Sinema will benefit manufacturers, who often use accelerated depreciation on equipment purchases. The National Association of Manufacturers and other trade groups had been complaining loudly about the potential impact of the Democrats’ proposal on U.S. companies. NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons said his organization was “glad to hear that accelerated depreciation provisions are removed, but we remain skeptical and will be reviewing the revised legislation carefully.”
A new 1% excise tax on stock buybacks will be added to the package instead. This will actually raise more revenue than the provisions getting dropped. Democrats have also agreed to support several billion dollars in drought funding sought by Sinema.
These changes were enough to secure Sinema’s support, a huge boost for Schumer and the White House. More on this in a minute.
Not everything in the package is settled. The centerpiece of the Democrats’ proposal – allowing Medicare to negotiate on prescription drug prices – is still undergoing revisions in order to comply with the Byrd Rule, the hyper-complex Senate procedure that controls reconciliation. There will be another meeting with the Senate parliamentarian on this issue today. Democrats are confident they can resolve any outstanding technicals problems.
Here’s Sinema on Thursday night’s deal:
“We have agreed to remove the carried interest tax provision, protect advanced manufacturing, and boost our clean energy economy in the Senate’s budget reconciliation legislation. Subject to the Parliamentarian’s review, I’ll move forward.
“Following this effort, I look forward to working with Senator Warner to enact carried interest tax reforms, protecting investments in America’s economy and encouraging continued growth while closing the most egregious loopholes that some abuse to avoid paying taxes.”
Schumer said he believes that all 50 Senate Democrats are now going to back the bill:
“I have had many productive discussions with members of our conference over the past three days and we have addressed a number of important issues they have raised. The agreement preserves the major components of the Inflation Reduction Act, including reducing prescription drug costs, fighting climate change, closing tax loopholes exploited by big corporations and the wealthy, and reducing the deficit by $300 billion. The final version of the Reconciliation bill, to be introduced on Saturday, will reflect this work and put us one step closer to enacting this historic legislation into law.”
And one more from Biden:
“The Inflation Reduction Act will help Americans save money on prescription drugs, health premiums, and much more. It will make our tax system more fair by making corporations pay a minimum tax. It will not raise taxes on those making less than $400,000, and it will reduce the deficit.”
What it means. Needless to say, this is an enormous moment for Democrats, especially Schumer, who’s overseen this process from the beginning. Despite sometimes heavy criticism of the New York Democrat’s style, Schumer has led his senators to this point. In another few days – and a bunch of votes – Schumer could get his biggest win as Democratic leader.
For Biden, this is more good news. The president’s poll numbers are still bad. But despite his party’s thin margin of control, Biden and Democratic leaders in Congress have gotten a ton of bipartisan wins. They have passed an infrastructure bill, gun control, CHIPS Plus, the PACT Act for veterans and confirmed a Supreme Court justice. Passing this reconciliation package provides another boost to Democratic incumbents and counters some of the GOP attacks on inflation and the economy.
For Sinema, this may undercut some of the attacks from the left following the bitter controversies earlier this year over the filibuster and voting rights. Progressives will never love her, and Sinema’s insistence on removing the carried interest provision has reignited criticism.
Sinema, though, is voting with Schumer and Biden on the most important Democratic legislative proposal of this Congress. And she’s been in the middle of some of the biggest bipartisan deals as well, including the $1 trillion infrastructure package, a huge Biden win. Sinema has been there for Biden on many – although not all – nominees, including Ketanji Brown Jackson for the Supreme Court. Sinema was on the Senate floor Thursday whipping votes for Arizona lawyer Roopali Desai for a spot on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Desai, who previously served as Sinema’s campaign attorney, is the first South Asian woman to serve on that panel.
Timing. The Senate isn’t in session today as the leadership gets ready to try to push the package across the finish line.
The Senate will come in at noon Saturday and vote at 12:30 p.m. on an unrelated procedural motion. At some point after that, the chamber will vote on the motion to proceed to the reconciliation bill.
Once the Senate formally takes up the reconciliation package, a 20-hour clock begins, with the time equally split between the two sides. We don’t anticipate that Democrats will take up much of their 10 hours, but Republicans will use some or all of their allotment.
We’d heard rumors that Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) would force the Senate’s clerk to read the entire 700-plus page bill out loud on the floor, as is allowed under the chamber’s rules. But Johnson told us this Thursday: “I’d hate to have the clerks read all that again.” It seems like that delay may be averted.
After the debate is done – presumably at some point late Saturday or more likely Sunday – the Senate will begin a vote-a-rama. Senators are allowed to offer unlimited amendments to the bill during this process. Some of these amendments may come from Democrats. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) – no fan of this legislation – has said he will try to improve the bill on the floor with his own amendments. Sanders is still expected to support the package even if his amendments fail.
However, the vast majority of the hundreds of expected amendments will come from Republicans. Not all of these amendments will get a vote, but several dozen could. The three vote-a-ramas held during this Congress have averaged roughly 40 votes each.
If everything goes according to Schumer’s plan, the Senate can move to passage of the reconciliation bill at some point Monday or Tuesday.
Whenever the Senate finishes its work, the House will have to come into session and pass the reconciliation package. We expect the House to return to town mid-week to consider reconciliation and police funding bills.
→ | One more thing: The Bureau of Labor Statistics will release the July inflation data Wednesday at 8:30 a.m. The White House hopes to have the Inflation Reduction Act through the Senate and on the way to a House vote by then. |
– Jake Sherman and John Bresnahan
PRESENTED BY HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
Seniors are speaking out! A large majority of seniors on Medicare are not supportive of changing the law so that the government can interfere in the successful Part D program.
Yet, Congress is considering policies that will insert the government into this already successful program. Lawmakers must abandon price setting policies and protect the access seniors depend on under Part D.
AD WATCH
Frontline Dems slammed over high prices on airwaves – not crime
Frontline House Democrats are facing relentless attacks on the airwaves back home over inflation and the soaring cost of living. While the negative ads run by Republican groups touch on steep gas prices and expensive grocery bills, the spots largely avoid criticizing Democrats over crime and public safety.
Only 6% of the ads we tracked hit Democrats on rising crime, compared to 60% which focused on inflation and 53% which centered on gas prices.
The barrage of attack ads have aimed to tie Democratic lawmakers’ voting history to sky-high inflation this year, according to a Punchbowl News analysis of AdImpact data. The GOP admakers’ focus on the economy comes as Democrats fret about being painted by Republicans as ‘soft on crime’ ahead of the midterms. Many House Democrats still blame the party’s perceived connection with the ‘defund the police’ movement for their lackluster 2020 showing.
The bulk of the attack ads are paid for by the American Action Network, the sister organization of the House GOP leadership-aligned Congressional Leadership Fund super PAC. In addition to dinging Democrats over their votes to support the American Rescue Plan, most of the spots also urge the lawmakers to oppose any reconciliation deal.
Rep. Dan Kildee’s (D-Mich.) race has seen an avalanche of attacks from another source — Kildee’s GOP opponent Paul Junge. Junge’s ads slam Kildee for voting with President Joe Biden and Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
It’s clear that Democrats in tough races nevertheless feel a need to shore up their law enforcement bonafides against GOP attacks. Last week, a group of Frontliners launched an unsuccessful effort to force votes on police funding bills along with the assault weapons ban. But despite the fear that Democrats will be perceived as weak on crime, GOP attack ads to date are centering on the economy.
→ | Here’s an example of an AAN ad targeting Virginia Democratic Rep. Elaine Luria: |
“Liberals like Elaine Luria teamed up with Biden and Pelosi, ignoring all the warnings. They spent trillions, making everything we buy more expensive. Groceries, gas, utilities — prices are through the roof.”
→ | A different AAN ad targets Rep. Cindy Axne (D-Iowa), accusing her of “killing the economy.” “Gas, groceries, life are all unaffordable,” the voiceover says. |
Another constant feature of the ads: Tying Democratic incumbents to Biden, whose approval ratings are scraping the bottom of the barrel.
→ | AAN connects Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) to Biden and blames the two for sky high heating oil and gas prices. |
→ | And here’s an ad from Junge that flags that Kildee votes with Biden “100% of the time.” |
Punchbowl News analyzed a total of 15 ads aimed at the top 10 most vulnerable House Democrats in 2022, including Kildee, Golden, Axne and Luria, in addition to Frontline Reps. Susie Lee (Nev.), Elissa Slotkin (Mich.), Tom Malinowski (N.J.), Abigail Spanberger (Va.), Susan Wild (Pa.) and Tom O’Halleran (Ariz.).
While the number may seem low, remember that the ad season doesn’t truly kick off for House races until later in the summer. Plus, the campaigns of most GOP challengers haven’t purchased significant ad buys yet.
— Max Cohen
WASHINGTON X THE WORLD
Pelosi, wrapping up Asia trip, is sanctioned by China
The Chinese government has levied unspecified sanctions on Speaker Nancy Pelosi in retaliation for her trip to Taiwan earlier this week.
Here’s the AP:
A Chinese Foreign Ministry statement said Friday that Pelosi had disregarded China’s concerns and resolute opposition to her visit to the self-ruled island, which Beijing claims.
Pelosi was the highest-ranking U.S. official to visit the self-governing island in 25 years. China claims Taiwan as its territory and opposes it having its own engagements with foreign governments.
The Chinese statement called Pelosi’s visit provocative and said it undermines China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. It said that sanctions would be imposed on Pelosi and her immediate family but did not say what they would be. Such sanctions are generally mostly symbolic in nature.
It’s fair to say that Pelosi wasn’t looking to go to China anytime soon, so, indeed, the sanctions are symbolic.
Pelosi has just wrapped up a weeklong trip to Asia, which included the hugely controversial visit to Taiwan. Pelosi also stopped in Singapore, Malaysia, South Korea and Japan.
The Chinese government has begun a massive set of military drills off Taiwan following Pelosi’s visit, including launching missiles and sending more than 100 planes into Taiwanese airspace. Chinese warships have also crossed the “median line” halfway between China and Taiwan.
In a news conference in Tokyo, Pelosi had this to say about China’s aggressive military moves toward Taiwan:
“[T[he Chinese made their strikes, probably using our visit as an excuse. Let me close by saying this: the Chinese have tried to isolate Taiwan, keeping them, most recently, from [the] World Health Organization by not even letting their participation be on the agenda of the world health agency – wherever that makes these determinations. They may try to keep Taiwan from visiting or participating in other places, but they will not isolate Taiwan by preventing us to travel there.”
The Coverage
→ | WaPo: “White House summons Chinese ambassador for rebuke on Taiwan response,” by Yasmeen Abutaleb |
→ | “Blinken: China military drills are ‘significant escalation,’” by David Rising in Phnom Penh, Cambodia |
— Jake Sherman
PRESENTED BY HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
Two-in-three seniors with Medicare prefer drug plans negotiate with the biopharmaceutical manufacturers INSTEAD of government price setting.
THE CAMPAIGN
→ | Here’s another good example of how Democrats are going to use the Dobbs decision in the midterms. This is an ad against Tudor Dixon, the GOP nominee for governor in Michigan. This spot, running statewide, uses examples of Dixon saying she wouldn’t allow abortions in almost any instance, including rape, incest or the heath of the mother. This is paid for by the group Put Michigan First. |
→ | And here’s another abortion ad by Sen. Mark Kelly’s (D-Ariz.) campaign, reminding voters that his GOP opponent, Blake Masters, has said abortion is “demonic.” |
– Jake Sherman
FRONTS
PRESENTED BY HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
View senior satisfaction survey here.
MOMENTS
10 a.m.: Sens. John Barrasso, John Thune, Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.) will talk about the reconciliation package in the Senate TV studio.
10:30 a.m.: President Joe Biden will get his daily intelligence briefing.
1 p.m.: Biden will sign two bills aimed at Covid relief fraud.
3 p.m.: Vice President Kamala Harris will hold a meeting with Latina state legislators on abortion rights.
CLIP FILE
NYT
→ | “How Republicans Are ‘Weaponizing’ Public Office Against Climate Action,” by David Gelles |
WaPo
→ | “Taliban denies knowing of al-Qaeda presence after Zawahiri killed in Kabul,” by Pamela Constable in Kabul |
WSJ
→ | “Gun Trafficking Surges Across State Lines: One Pistol’s 1,200-Mile Journey to a Boston Homicide,” by Dan Frosch and Zusha Elinson |
Bloomberg
→ | “The US-Led Drive to Isolate Russia and China Is Falling Short,” by Alan Crawford, Jenni Marsh, and Antony Sguazzin |
AP
→ | “Trump ally Kari Lake wins GOP primary for Arizona governor,” by Jonathan J. Cooper |
→ | “3 more ships with grain depart Ukraine ports under UN deal,” by Zeynep Bilginsoy |
Politico
→ | “Pharma group leader says Dems who vote for reconciliation bill ‘won’t get a free pass,” by Megan R. Wilson |
USA Today
→ | “Trump PAC formed to push debunked voter fraud claims paid $60K to Melania Trump’s fashion designer,” by Erin Mansfield |
PRESENTED BY HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
As lawmakers continue to debate prescription drug reforms that could disrupt the Medicare program, Seniors Speak Out went directly to the source to find out exactly how seniors feel about this vital program.
When asked about recent policies being considered in congress, 66% of seniors indicated we should let Part D plans negotiate directly with the biopharmaceutical industry INSTEAD of letting the government set prices.
Despite these findings, lawmakers continue to move forward with bad policy while failing to consider this important input of the beneficiaries who would be directly affected.
Editorial photos provided by Getty Images. Political ads courtesy of AdImpact.
Crucial Capitol Hill news AM, Midday, and PM—5 times a week
Join a community of some of the most powerful people in Washington and beyond. Exclusive newsmaker events, parties, in-person and virtual briefings and more.
Subscribe to PremiumThe Canvass Year-End Report
And what senior aides and downtown figures believe will happen in 2023.
Check it out