The Archive
Every issue of the Punchbowl News newsletter, including our special editions, right here at your fingertips.
Join the community, and get the morning edition delivered straight to your inbox.
![]() PRESENTED BY![]() BY JOHN BRESNAHAN, ANNA PALMER AND JAKE SHERMAN THE TOPThe Sept. 11 terror attacks were 20 years ago tomorrow, and let’s state the obvious for a moment — Congress and Washington are vastly different than they were two decades ago. The post-Sept. 11 period was the last real sustained bout of bipartisanship against a common enemy — global terrorism — that our country has experienced. As the United States mourned and counted its dead, President George W. Bush soared to a spectacular 90 percent approval rating. Within a week, Congress gave Bush the authority to use military force against “those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001,” a blank check that Bush and his successors have stretched to unimaginable lengths. The Afghanistan war that began following the 9/11 attack just ended in an ignominious U.S. withdrawal, a sad final chapter for both a superpower that mistakenly believed it could change everything and the poor country that appears to be marching backward. Think of the other crises Congress has been through since 9/11: the interminable Iraq and Afghanistan wars; the 2008 financial meltdown; the 2011 debt ceiling showdown; multiple congressional shootings; multiple government shutdowns; a big chunk of Donald Trump’s presidency; multiple presidential impeachments; and a global pandemic. All of which was topped off by an ugly partisan fight over who won the presidency in 2020, a dispute that’s still reverberating throughout the country. And that’s not even factoring in the eternal struggle over taxes, health care or federal regulations. Sure, we’ve seen spurts of bipartisanship, with the response to the Covid-19 pandemic being the most obvious example. In fact, it’s a quasi miracle that Congress was able to come together in that crisis considering what occurred after the November elections. And even more ominously, during the bloody Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Here’s one statistic that may surprise you: Just 87 lawmakers, or roughly 16 percent of Congress, who were in office on 9/11 are still serving now. Thirty senators and 57 House members. The firsthand memories of that horrible time, the fear, anger and uncertainty, are slowly receding from Capitol Hill, although they’ve been replaced by other painful lessons. Not a single member of the current House Republican leadership was even in Congress. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy was a district director for former Rep. Bill Thomas (Calif.), while Minority Whip Steve Scalise was serving in the Louisiana legislature. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) was a teenager. The rising generation of House Democratic leaders, such as Reps. Hakeem Jeffries of New York and Katherine Clark of Massachusetts, were more than a decade from winning their seats. Twenty years ago, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer were locked in a fight for House minority whip, a contest that Pelosi would win just a month after 9/11. Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) had been chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, but he hadn’t made it into leadership yet. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell — not yet the Democratic boogeyman — was serving as NRSC chair. For Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, whose home city was attacked, 9/11 was a searing, life-changing moment, both personally and politically. Schumer threw himself into the efforts to rebuild New York, lobbying endlessly for federal help for its recovery. These efforts are still ongoing, as first responders and workers who toiled at the World Trade Center site now suffer from exposure to asbestos and other hazardous materials two decades later. Bush gave permission for Schumer and then-Sen. Hillary Clinton to fly back to New York City on Sept. 12, 2001. Theirs was the only plane in the air except for the fighter aircraft escort accompanying them. “We landed, we went down to the site,” Schumer recalled in a Senate floor speech two years ago. “The smell of death and burnt flesh was in the air. And a scene I will never forget. A thousand people lined up — no one knew who had lived and who had died — with little signs. ‘Have you seen my mother Mary?’ ‘Have you seen my son Bill?’ That stays with you.” Schumer noted that he’s worn an American flag in his lapel every day since 9/11. “I think of those who were lost, and I think of the valor of New Yorkers,” Schumer said. The coverage: → “From 9/11’s ashes, a new world took shape. It did not last,” by Calvin Woodward, Ellen Knickmeyer and David Rising PRESENTED BY PHRMA New CBO Report finds that even under its conservative assumptions at least 60 new treatments and cures will be sacrificed if H.R. 3 becomes reality. Instead, Congress should focus on commonsense, patient-centered solutions to address voters’ true concerns, like lowering out-of-pocket costs while protecting current and future access to medicines. IMMIGRATION SEIU launches ad campaign backing immigration push for reconciliation package The Service Employees International Union is launching a $1 million national TV and digital ad campaign in D.C. and key battleground states to urge Congress to pass immigration reform as part of the reconciliation package. The effort comes as GOP and Democratic staffers are set to meet today with Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough to make the case for and against including a pathway to citizenship for hundreds of thousands of Dreamers, TPS holders, migrant farm workers and other undocumented immigrants as part of the $3.5 trillion legislation. MacDonough will decide whether these immigration provisions comply with the “Byrd Rule,” a complex series of tests that govern consideration of reconciliation legislation. If she rules they don’t comply, then the provisions would be classified as a “extraneous matter” and a 60-vote point of order will be raised against them. Democrats aren’t likely to win that kind of vote, so the stakes here are huge. The ad “Our Moment” focuses on the support for immigration reform and in particular a pathway to citizenship for essential workers, farm workers and Dreamers. The ad will run in D.C., Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, Arizona and West Virginia. Sources familiar with the effort said this initial buy could grow depending on what happens in the Senate. STATE OF THE ART Pence calls 2020 a "contested takeover" in NRSC fundraising email ![]() If you ever got the sense that fundraising emails weren’t on the level, here’s another data point for you. The NRSC sent out a fundraising email Thursday “from” former Vice President Mike Pence in which he said President Joe Biden’s victory in 2020 was a “contested takeover.” This didn’t sound like Pence, since the then-VP has made it clear that he thought it was his duty to certify the 2020 election. In June, Pence said he was “proud” to do so in the early hours of Jan. 7 following the bloody Capitol attack by supporters of former President Donald Trump, some of whom were looking to do harm to Pence. It turns out Pence didn’t write this, say this or have anything to do with this email. Here’s the NRSC’s Chris Hartline:
So next time you read a fundraising appeal, remember this. They could be completely bogus money-making schemes disconnected from the principal they purport to represent. MCCARTHY V. PELOSI McCarthy takes proxy voting lawsuit to Supreme Court We’ve written time and again that the relationship between House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and Speaker Nancy Pelosi is the worst we’ve seen among congressional leaders in recent years. Like historically bad. And getting even worse. Still, it was a little surprising that McCarthy — who could be the next speaker — decided to go to the Supreme Court in an effort to overturn the House proxy voting rules instituted during the Covid-19 pandemic. Especially since so many Republicans have used this process to cast floor votes themselves. McCarthy has lost his case at the district and appeals court level, but he feels strongly about this issue, so he’s pressing ahead anyway. WaPo’s Amy B. Wang has the details:
PRESENTED BY PHRMA Fact: 65% of Americans oppose Medicare negotiation when it leads to tradeoffs like limits on people’s access to medicines or less R&D of new treatments and cures. FRONT PAGES ![]() "America doesn’t forget." Check out USA Today’s front page marking the 20th anniversary of Sept. 11. MOMENTS 9 a.m.: President Joe Biden receives the daily brief. 9:30 a.m.: Biden, First Lady Jill Biden and Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona tour a school in Washington, D.C. 10:00 a.m.: Vice President Kamala Harris travels to Hampton, Va. 10:20 a.m.: Biden and the first lady deliver remarks about keeping students safe. 11:30 a.m.: The White House Covid-19 Response Team will hold a press briefing with health officials. 1 p.m.: Jen Psaki will brief. 8:15 p.m.: Biden will depart for Joint Base Andrews for Queens, N.Y. CLIP FILE NYT → News Analysis: “Biden’s New Vaccine Push Is a Fight for the U.S. Economy,” by Jim Tankersley → “Why $46 Billion Couldn’t Prevent an Eviction Crisis,” by Glenn Thrush and Conor Dougherty WaPo → “Justice Department sues Texas to block six-week abortion ban,” by Devlin Barrett and Ann E. Marimow → “Republican governors threaten to sue over Biden’s sweeping vaccine mandates,” by Annabelle Timsit and Bryan Pietsch WSJ → “U.S. Airlines Warn of Dimming Outlook Amid Delta Variant,” by Alison Sider → WSJ Editorial Board: “Transforming America in 17 Days” AP →“Analysis: Biden’s war on virus becomes war on unvaccinated,” by Zeke Miller → “Biden calls Xi as US-China relationship grows more fraught,” by Aamer Madhani and Joe McDonald Politico → “Hundreds of law enforcement officials were prepped early for potential Jan. 6 violence,” by Betsy Woodruff Swan PRESENTED BY PHRMA Proponents of government price setting often misrepresent voter opinion on support for allowing the federal government to “negotiate” drug prices. While nine out of 10 Americans said in a recent Kaiser Family Foundation poll that they support drug price negotiation, opposition to the approach soared to 65% when respondents were told negotiation could limit people’s access to medicines or result in fewer new treatments and cures. Non-partisan, independent public polls have repeatedly demonstrated that once Americans understand what government negotiation is, and what the tradeoffs are, support drops dramatically.
![]() Enjoying Punchbowl News AM? ![]() Subscribe 10 friends with your unique link (below) and get a Punchbowl News hat! Your referral link is: Or share via You currently have: 0 referrals
|

Crucial Capitol Hill news AM, Midday, and PM—5 times a week
Join a community of some of the most powerful people in Washington and beyond. Exclusive newsmaker events, parties, in-person and virtual briefings and more.
Subscribe to Premium
The Canvass Year-End Report
And what senior aides and downtown figures believe will happen in 2023.
Check it out