Skip to content
Sign up to receive our free weekday morning edition, and you'll never miss a scoop.
Gruenberg’s decision to resign comes fewer than 24 hours before the long-time regulator is expected to testify before the House.

Dems grapple with a nasty FDIC report

Congressional Democrats are in a tough spot.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chair Martin Gruenberg is under significant political pressure from Republicans to resign. That’s thanks to an independent third-party report that documented significant problems with the agency’s workplace culture and anti-harassment policies, as well as the chair’s own temper.

Gruenberg is — incidentally! — a crucial vote supporting the Biden administration’s financial policy agenda. And while key Democratic lawmakers say they’ll continue to support the embattled regulator, there are already signs of fracture among rank-and-file members.

Start with supporters: Top financial services Democrats like Sens. Sherrod Brown (Ohio), Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) and Rep. Maxine Waters (Calif.) are all backing Gruenberg.

Warren told us Tuesday night that Gruenberg was “clearly committed to accepting the recommendations of the independent investigation and to make changes at the FDIC.” The Massachusetts Democrat added “The problems with the FDIC date back to Democratic and Republican administrations going back many, many years.”

In an interview, Waters acknowledged some “legitimate criticism about management overall for some period of time.” But asked if Gruenberg should resign, the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee replied “Oh no. No, no, no.”

There are problems: We were interviewing Waters Tuesday night in the Capitol basement when Rep. Bill Foster (D-Ill.) approached the California Democrat to inform her he’d called for Gruenberg to resign minutes before. Foster is the top Democrat of the House Financial Services subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Monetary Policy.

Foster told Waters the allegations reported out by independent investigators at Cleary Gottlieb were “really bad.” Waters said: “Sounds like more mismanagement to me than misbehavior.”

Foster replied that “personal misbehavior” was “not what put it over the threshold for me.”

Foster isn’t alone among Democrats with concerns, publicly or privately. Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) suggested that Gruenberg would face credibility issues if he continued atop the FDIC:

Capitol Hill needs more time to digest the report in full. The majority of Democrats we asked for comment last night deferred, saying they hadn’t had a chance to read the investigation yet.

This isn’t likely to get better with time or closer inspection. “The summaries are not very pretty,” Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) said.

Presented by AstraZeneca

The 340B program was created to help patients. Instead, it’s helping hospitals earn massive profits. The 340B Rebate Model Pilot uses rapid verification of existing data to prevent duplicate discounts, strengthening program transparency and efficiency. Urge HHS to implement the Rebate Model Pilot and ensure 340B functions as intended. Get the facts.

Editorial photos provided by Getty Images. Political ads courtesy of AdImpact.

Presented by AstraZeneca

The 340B program is supposed to help vulnerable patients—but without strong safeguards, it’s siphoning away funds that could be used for free and charitable medicine. The 340B Rebate Model Pilot improves program integrity, preventing duplicate discounts and strengthening accountability. Urge HHS to implement the pilot today. Learn why it matters.

Welcome to Punchbowl News AM! We're glad to have you here.

Want to get more of what you need? Share a bit more about yourself to help us tailor your reader experience.

Thank you for signing up!

Thank you for signing up!

 

We have sent you a confirmation email. Please follow the provided instructions to complete your sign-up.

Thank you for confirming! You are now subscribed to the Punchbowl News AM list.

You're subscribed! Welcome to the community.