Skip to content
Sign up to receive our free weekday morning edition, and you'll never miss a scoop.
The Maryland Democrat wanted to know who is running OPM and does DOGE have representatives at OPM, among other questions.

Hoyer, Approps Dems seeking hearing with Musk and Vought

Rep. Steny Hoyer (Md.), ranking member of the Financial Services and General Government subcommittee on the House Appropriations Committee, and several other Democrats on the panel want Republicans to call Elon Musk, OMB Director Russ Vought and Amy Gleason, acting administrator for the U.S. DOGE Service, to explain how DOGE operates and how it’s funded.

In a new letter to Rep. David Joyce (R-Ohio), the FSGG cardinal, Hoyer and the other Democrats note that their subcommittee has jurisdiction over funding for much of the Executive Office of the President. This includes DOGE, which President Donald Trump created by executive order on his first day back in office.

Hoyer plus Democratic Reps. Mark Pocan (Wis.), Glenn Ivey (Md.), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Wash.) and Sanford Bishop (Ga.) question whether DOGE is an independent agency or an “advisory body” designed to assist the president. This is an important distinction, including whether FOIA and other presidential record-keeping requirements apply to DOGE.

Hoyer and the other Democrats also wonder how OMB has funded DOGE and whether it violated federal laws in doing so. They say an oversight hearing would resolve these questions:

“This Committee holds jurisdiction for the appropriations for the Executive Office of the President, which includes both USDS and the Office of Management and Budget. For these reasons, we urgently request that the Subcommittee convene an oversight hearing with Mr. Musk, whom the President has described as the head of DOGE, Acting USDS Administrator Amy Gleason, and OMB Director Vought to provide transparency and substantive answers for our constituents and to consider whether more systemic reforms are needed to address USDS’s functions.”

Presented by AstraZeneca

The 340B program was created to help patients. Instead, it’s helping hospitals earn massive profits. The 340B Rebate Model Pilot uses rapid verification of existing data to prevent duplicate discounts, strengthening program transparency and efficiency. Urge HHS to implement the Rebate Model Pilot and ensure 340B functions as intended. Get the facts.

Editorial photos provided by Getty Images. Political ads courtesy of AdImpact.

Presented by AstraZeneca

The 340B program is supposed to help vulnerable patients—but without strong safeguards, it’s siphoning away funds that could be used for free and charitable medicine. The 340B Rebate Model Pilot improves program integrity, preventing duplicate discounts and strengthening accountability. Urge HHS to implement the pilot today. Learn why it matters.

Welcome to Punchbowl News AM! We're glad to have you here.

Want to get more of what you need? Share a bit more about yourself to help us tailor your reader experience.

Thank you for signing up!

Thank you for signing up!

 

We have sent you a confirmation email. Please follow the provided instructions to complete your sign-up.

Thank you for confirming! You are now subscribed to the Punchbowl News AM list.

You're subscribed! Welcome to the community.