|
SPRING CHALLENGE Can Congress combat China? Here’s a good test for the World’s Greatest Deliberative Body: Can the Senate do something dramatic to help the United States counter China’s growing economic, military and technological power, with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and a group of Senate Republicans pushing for it? Or is the partisan atmosphere just too toxic to overcome, even when key lawmakers in both parties and the White House want to act? We’ll find out the answer in the next few weeks. Schumer and Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.) will unveil an updated version of the “Endless Frontier Act” this morning. This legislation would authorize tens of billions of dollars in new spending for the National Science Foundation — to be renamed the “National Science and Technology Foundation” — to help boost U.S. high-tech research and advanced manufacturing. It’s only an authorization bill — which dictates policy — so there’s no funding attached, but it’s a priority for Schumer. Commerce Committee Chair Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) is expected to announce a markup of the legislation in her panel for next week, we’re told. Republicans say Schumer has committed to “regular order,” so amendments can be offered in committee and on the floor. The new proposal — which will cost north of $100 billion — will be sponsored by 14 senators, evenly split between the two parties. In addition to Schumer and Young, co-sponsors include Sens. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Rob Portman (R-Ohio), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Steve Daines (R-Mont), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Roy Blunt (R-Mo) Mitt Romney (R-Utah), and Mark Kelly (D-Ariz). That’s cuts a huge ideological and regional swath across the Senate. Young, Hassan and Kelly are up for re-election next year. On the House side, Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.) are the lead sponsors, with Reps. Susan Wild (D-Pa.), Mike Turner (R-Ohio), Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) and Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.) as co-sponsors. “This is a rare opportunity to show the authoritarians in Beijing, and the rest of the world, that when it comes to our national security, and most importantly our China policy, we are united,” Young said in a statement. Despite backing from those seven Senate Republicans, the real question is whether Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and the rest of the GOP Conference will go for it. There are concerns about what happens to the long-established national labs and whether this package will send too much money to one agency. “Well, at this point, I think we’re all trying to understand what’s in it,” McConnell said. “And my understanding is it’s going to be a regular order process, and we’ll educate everybody.” But the Schumer-Young bill is one of several China-related threads at play in the Senate right now. Schumer could potentially package them together on the floor, depending on what happens to the individual initiatives: → The CHIPS for America Act: Sens. Mark Warner (D-Va.) and John Cornyn (R-Texas) led a bipartisan group that put language in the massive defense policy bill last year to provide incentives to expand semiconductor manufacturing in the United States. They hoped the Finance Committee would create a tax credit, but that didn’t happen. So the proposal is authorized but not funded. In a meeting with Schumer and Young Monday night, Cornyn said they discussed using $50 billion proposed by President Joe Biden in the American Jobs Plan to aid U.S. semiconductor manufacturing via the Warner-Cornyn effort. Cornyn suggested that funding be coupled with the Endless Frontier Act, as long as Democrats don’t throw in “extraneous provisions,” such as contract wage language to appease labor unions. “This is clearly a win, it’s a bipartisan win,” Cornyn said. “It’s important. It’s number one on everyone’s agenda, which is China. So let’s not screw this up.” → The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is scheduled to mark up two China-related bills on Wednesday, one of which is the “Strategic Competition Act of 2021.” This is a sweeping proposal by Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Jim Risch (R-Idaho), the chair and ranking member of the panel. It would “direct the entire executive branch to make the People’s Republic of China as the greatest geopolitical and geoeconomic challenge for United States foreign policy” via a host of policy initiatives. The Chinese government is already publicly criticizing this legislation, so that should help it in the Senate. Another bill by Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Cornyn would create a “China Censorship Monitor and Action Group” among federal agencies to counter efforts to censor any Americans or U.S. companies that do business in China. So, put this all together: China is the United States’ biggest geopolitical threat — it seems like everyone agrees with that. Congress wants to begin combating that. Will they be able to? BTW: We are in the field with our first anonymous survey of senior aides on Capitol Hill: The Canvass. Want to get in on the action? If you are a chief, staff director, LD, comms director or press secretary — sign up! PRESENTED BY FACEBOOK It’s time to update internet regulations The internet has changed a lot in the 25 years since lawmakers last passed comprehensive internet regulations. It’s time for an update. See how we’re making progress on key issues and why we support updated regulations to set clear rules for addressing today’s toughest challenges. INSIDE THE SENATE Will the Senate GOP bring back earmarks? The Senate Republican Conference is supposed to decide today whether it will bring back earmarks. And it looks like it’s going to be close. The anti-earmark faction, led by GOP Sens. Mike Lee (Utah), John Cornyn (Texas), Steve Daines (Mont.) and others, have been very vocal in their opposition to the practice, which fell out of favor a decade ago following several huge scandals. The Republican Conference adopted a rule banning earmarks last Congress. But the pro-earmarkers have several things going for them, and it may be enough in the end. First, Senate Democrats, led by Appropriations Committee Chair Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), are going to start inserting earmarks — or “congressionally directed spending” — in spending bills no matter what Republicans do. There’ll be restrictions on what entities can receive earmarks, and senators will have to declare they have no personal financial interest in the earmarks. And secondly, House Republicans have already approved the use of earmarks again, following the lead of their Democratic counterparts in the chamber. That vote was close, but since it was a secret ballot, the pro-earmarkers won. Republican senators say they aren’t sure what the conference will do at this point. As usual, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) — a champion earmarker back in the day — isn’t showing his hand yet. “It’s pretty hard because it hasn’t been talked about much, except just in groups,” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said. “And they haven’t taken any show of hands. But I say it’s going to be split. If you’re saying, is it going to be overwhelming one way or another? No, it won’t be.” “A lot of our members want it,” Senate Minority Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) said. “They don’t want to get boxed out.” Thune — known in the Capitol for his blunt honesty — made two important points: No one has offered a formal proposal to eliminate the ban, so it will stay in place until changed. They expect a proposal to come, but no one has made it yet. And the South Dakota Republican pointed out that if a Senate Republican got an earmark from Democrats despite the GOP ban, there’s little chance that their colleagues would punish them anyway. However, this may not matter anyway. There’s a good chance the appropriations process could blow up depending on what happens with President Joe Biden’s infrastructure bill. Which could mean a year-end stop-gap funding bill and no earmarks. Womp womp. NOMS NOMS NOMS Senate fight over Gupta may fall to VP Harris The Senate will vote today over whether to move forward with the nomination of Vanita Gupta, President Joe Biden’s pick for the No. 3 post at the Justice Department. If all 50 Senate Republicans show up and vote, Vice President Kamala Harris may need to cast the tie-breaker. Gupta, who has been nominated to become associate attorney general, has been hit by hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of ads from the Judicial Crisis Network, which is opposed to her nomination. JCN says Gupta wants to defund the police, and the group has pegged her as being soft on crime. Other conservative groups are also targeting her as well. Democrats and Gupta’s backers dismiss the claims as untrue and note her nomination has been endorsed by a number of pro-police organizations. Gupta was head of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division under former President Barack Obama. During the Trump era, she ran the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a broad coalition of progressive groups. Gupta has been outspoken in her support of progressive viewpoints on policing, racism and criminal justice issues, hence the strong opposition from the right. All 50 Senate Republicans are opposed to Gupta. The Judiciary Committee tied on her nomination, but under the Senate’s power-sharing agreement, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) was able to push her nomination forward anyway. So far, Democrats have gotten by without needing Harris on several procedural votes related to this nomination. That could change if all Senate Republicans show up to vote no. But Democrats are confident they will overcome the GOP filibuster on this nomination and confirm her later today. PUNCHBOWL NEWS EVENTS Pop Up Conversation with Sen. Dick Durbin THURSDAY, APRIL 22 @ 9 A.M. EST Immigration legislation passed the House, but it doesn’t have a clear pathway in the Senate. Punchbowl News, in partnership with FWD.us, will sit down with Sen. Dick Durbin, who has been leading the effort in the Senate. We will discuss the state of play and what concrete changes he thinks could happen this year. And the big question: Could inaction force Democrats to get rid of the legislative filibuster to try and get it passed. RSVP Here ![endif]>


